Decision-Making and Problem-Solving
Problem-solving
refers to the mental activity people undertake to reach a goal while decision-making
involves evaluating alternatives and choosing a course of action. There are
many different ways that we can go about these processes. Deductive
reasoning would begin with an assumption or hypothesis which is then tested
against possible evidence. For example, the statement all birds have feathers
and Cardinals are birds so Cardinals must have feathers. Inductive reasoning
begins with observations and ends with a generalization or hypothesis that fits
the observations. For example, a person who breaks out in hives each time they
eat shellfish will likely conclude that they're allergic to shellfish.
To solve problems people
can use logical stepwise approaches including trial and error in which people
tried different approaches until they reach the correct solution or algorithms.
Step by step approach is guided by logic which can be more efficient, but these
types of reasoning take time and effort and in everyday life we often rely on
problem-solving shortcuts related to intuition or flashes of insight based on
unconscious information processing or heuristics mental shortcuts that simplify
decision-making by replacing a difficult question with an easier one. For
example, the affect heuristic describes a situation where a person makes a decision
based on emotions rather than a reasoned evaluation of potential risks and
rewards, for example a medical procedure described as having a 3 in 10 chance
of leading to serious side-effects feels risky well 1 described as having a 7
in 10 chance of being side-effect free feel safe the actual odds of
side-effects are identical but the first presentation triggers fear making
people less likely to choose the treatment.
The availability heuristic
involves relying on the most easily available information to make a decision
rather than making use of all available information for example people assume
that there are more English words that begin with K and words that have K as a
third letter because it's far easier for them to think of words that begin with
K. The representative heuristic involves making assumptions about
individual persons or things based on mental prototypes, for example stereotypes
about race gender and class heuristics often work well for simple or fast
decisions but they can often lead to bias decision-making. These biases are part
of people's schemas but they can also skew their picture of the world, for example
the fundamental attribution error occurs when someone weighs a person's
potential character traits more highly than contacts and environment when
judging the causes of behavior for example people may assume a driver ran a red
light because he's a reckless jerk overlooking the fact that the driver had the
Sun glaring in his eyes on the flip side of this the actor-observer effect occurs
when people attribute their own behavior to context but I tribute the behavior
of others to personality traits for example a student may believe that they
fail to test because it was unreasonably hard but think that their annoying
roommate failed it due to their laziness or stupid relatedly the self-serving
bias involves attributing success to personal traits but failure to outside
forces for example when they pass a test they believe it's because that they're
smart but when they fail it it's because the instructor doesn't like them
hindsight bias refers to the perception of knowing all along with the outcome
of a particular event would be for example after an underdog team wins a game
fans may claim that they saw the victory coming and confirmation bias occurs
when a person considers only evidence that supports their view.
So, someone with a strong
opinion about the health benefits of a certain superfood may discount evidence
disconfirming their beliefs even if someone avoids these biases they may still
run into other barriers to effective problem solving for example functional
fixedness is the inability to recognize that an object can be used in non-traditional
ways such as using a wrench as a paperweight or to prop open a door rigid
thinking or a fixed perspective that is stubbornly maintained as well as the
inability to recognize irrelevant information can also inhibit a
problem-solving. These two styles of thinking can be further described as being
part of two systems during fast thinking:
System 1 thinking the
mind makes use of instinct intuition schemas and truistic Stern's rapid
conclusions for example a pedestrian seeing a car careening down the street and
diving out of the way we also employ slow thinking. System 2 thinking or
careful analytical reasoning to make complex decisions we would like to think
that people rely mostly on system 2 in practice system 1 thinking often guides
people or is more influential for example people are often fooled by the way a
problem is framed consumers are much more likely to buy a 90% fat free product
that a product advertises containing 10% fat these two statements can be the
same information but the framing makes all the difference the positives that in
the first statement is much more appealing to a decision maker.
Comments
Post a Comment