Coach Behavior in Psychology
Introduction
Coach behavior refers to how coaches interact with their athletes (Cote & Yardley, 1999).
Indeed, coach behavior influences athlete development (Cushion, 2010), the coach-athlete relationship
(Nicholls, Levy, Jones, Meir, Radcliffe, & Perry, 2016), and anxiety levels (Ledochowski, Unterrainer,
Ruedl, Schnitzer, & Kopp, 2012). Athlete preferences for coach behavior varied according to the
situation, with players preferring more instruction and training behavior, positive feedback, democratic
behavior, and social support after poorer performances compared to when the team were doing well.
Chelladurai, (1984) found athlete preferences for coach behavior varied across individuals.
Coach
Behavior Definitions
Coach behavior refers to how coaches interact with
their athletes (Cote
& Yardley, 1999). The
ultimate effects that coaching behavior exerts are mediated by the meaning that
players attribute to them (Smoll & Smith, 2009).
A coach’s successful leadership changes an athlete’s behavior as a function of the coach’s effort and gets others to behave as the manager/coach intends them to behave. The task may be completed, and the coach’s needs may be satisfied, but the players’ needs are ignored (Cribben, 1981).
The coach’s behavior impacts on athletes’ behavior, cognitions and affective responses, and coaches can influence whether athletes learn and achieve at a high level, enjoy their experience, demonstrate effort and persistence, and develop a sense of confidence and a self-determined motivational orientation (Smoll & Smith, 2002). Theories on Coach Behavior
- The 3 Cs Conceptual Model
Jowett and Cockerill, (2002) developed the 3+1 Cs model of the coach-athlete relationship.
This model comprises of closeness (i.e., the extent to which the athlete and coach value, support, and
care for each other), commitment (i.e., the intent from both parties to maintain the relationship),
complementarity (i.e., the extent to which the behaviors of the coach and athlete correspond to each
other), and finally, co-orientation that is whether there are common views between the coach and
athlete (Jowett & Cockerill, 2002).
- The Coaching Model (CM)
Cote, Salmela, Trudel, Baria and Russell, (1995) proposed the coaching model. The CM
stipulates that the coaching process is best understood by examining the interaction of three types of
coach behaviors, training, competition, and organizational behaviors. Further, each of these behaviors
is affected by the coach’s personal charactristics, athlete’s personal charactristics, and various
contextual factors. Several studies have provided support to the CM as a valuable framework to study
coaches’ behaviors (Cote et al., 1995).
- Multidimensional Model of Leadership
Chelladurai, (1998) presented the multidimensional model of leadership. The model typically
presented to explain the complex interaction between coach and athlete. This model proposes that
athlete outcomes such as satisfaction are determined by the level of congruency among the coach
behaviors required by the task, coach behaviors preffered by the athlete, and actual coach behaviors
perceived by the athlete. High cogruency among these behaviors results in high satisfaction with the
coach (Chelladurai, 1998).
Comments
Post a Comment